Was Spider-Man3 Better than 1 and 2?...personally i think that if u didn't see neither 1 or 2 than you will not be lost in the third...but yes i think it was better than 1 and 2

I dont think it was. Number 1 made me think it was the best marvel film and then number 2 made me think it was the best marvel film but number 3 didnt. Dont get me wrong, i thought the film was great but the other 2 are better. Number 3 just put too much into one film.

i agree

#1 & 2 each had 1 storyline/villian they stuck to. SP3 was all over place. so in terms of a good story line, no. 1 & 2 were better. But SP3 is still way up there in the good movie section

I think it was. It was darker and a bit crazier, like the dance show off scene. ALso I love venom, and the bib sand monster was cool

Also Wasnt venom a little bit too small. It would have been better if they made him hench.

i really cant say

You see, SM3 didnt have much action at all especially for 2 villians AND 2 heroes, it was more storylinish, more about emotions.

2 was better

There has been a lot of hype over 3. I think I heard that it set the latest weekend box office record. However, I liked 2 the best.

SM3 wasnt the best one. Was it still good, very much so. I think 2 was better, but I still thought venom was awesome since i'm a big venom fan.

Wrong section, this should be in the off topic entertainment area.

whatever, i think spiderman 3 is mediocre, spideman 1 is way much better

2 had the best balance of everything, I think it was the best movie

Spidey 3 was better then #1 but not #2

Spidey 2 is still the best comic movie ever.

Spidey 3 has the best fight scenes. But that was watered down by all the bland diagolue and comedy.

Spidey 3 is still a enjoyable movie. I saw it twice. But it's not better then spidey 2. They try to cram to much into spidey 3. It's already confirmed that spidey 4 is going to happen. They should of used sandman as the main villian for #3 and just set up venom at the end and let him be the main star for spidey #4. Venom is the fan favorite villan. He deserves his own movie. But now he's dead(Yes i know the symbotie is still alive. But i would hate if venom does come back in spidey 4 and topher grace don't. He did a great job!)

is it worth to see. i stll wanna see it.

Spiderman 2 > Spiderman > Spiderman 3. They were all good though. Better than superman and batman's latest films put together anyways

SPIDER MAN IS THE SHIT. NO DOUBT ABOUT IT...BUT 3 COULD HAVE BEEN BETTER! THEY TOUCHED TO LIGHTLY ON THE CHARACTERS. LIKE VENOM! AND Y WAS VENOM SO SMALL IN THE FILM ?

i'd say spiderman 1 is a feel good movie. while 2 was more of the likable one and 3 is action packed... different people finds different spiderman as the best, but the bottom line is all three are on top of the best movies list!

Well I think that the 3rd one is the best the other ones only had one villian while this one had 3 all at the same time and everyones complainin about venoms size but hes gonna be in the next one 2 so it doesnt really matter if hes big yet he'll b bigger in the next one


it will leave u hanging though if u havnt cn the first one

I think 1 was better but 3 wasn't so bad. Too much stuff packed into the movie. I knew it was about a two hour film and I was wondering if the story would finish in time. Also too much emotion.

spidey 1 was well the best

spiderman 3 was just full of open ended endings. there were just too many villains.

I thot it sucked! I wanted very much to like it but just couldn't. 1 & 2 were great but 3 was an emotional ping pong match and not a very good one either.

Spider-Man 3 was ok. More super-hero fights than the previous 2, but still not a whole lot of new stuff.

it was ok as far as spiderman goes. i didnt really get into the comics like that though. but it was intertaining for a few minutes

not really black spider was cool but the movie was really stupid i liked 1 better for some reason.

I think 2 was the best. The third was more jumbled and rushed. Almost the hjolw movie was no action and mostly just character buildup. i was really dissapointted

spiderman 1 was better lol

venom was asome yes its better than 1 and 2

We all have our secret love for Black-Spidy.
The movie was good, I liked it personally.
Now some people just downright hated it.
The reason? Many responded as "They got into the character too much and not enough action." Survey taken at a college
Hmmm .... But isn't that what Comic Heroes are all about? Isn't that what comics are all about? Getting into the character, trying to making it more meaningful then just "action based." Somewhere down the line I think we lost the meaning of watching a movie or reading a book. Our mentality of understanding deeper meanings or trying to find one has been distributed. All we seems to like are things that moves fast, and things that doesn't require us to think too much.

spiderman 3 was the best although like neiltot sed there wer too many villans

Well Spiderman 3 had better effects BUT it was to cheesy for my liking.


Venom was great tho lol

But still it was a disapointment i think the best one out of the 3 has to be 2

never saw 1 or 2 completely but 3 was pretty good. cept for the part when he went all emo and started danciing in the street like a douche.

man hellz yeah it was better

the first movie is always the best

Too me Spider man 3 was just a lil to mushy (Emotional) for my taste, 2 was best and 1 was ok.

i think spider man 3 was better. It did have a lot more fighting

I think the 3rd part is over done

I think the 3rd part is over done

I think the 3rd part is over done

They were all good but part 1 is always the best

I think the 3rd part is over done

No. I think part 1 was the best.

the first was the best